Son makes successful Inheritance Act claim after being left out of his mother’s will.
Contact our dedicated Will Dispute Claimline for a free consultation about being left out of a will. Call 0333 888 0409 or email us at info@contesting-wills.co.uk
Background to the case
An adult son has successfully brought a challenge under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 against the estate of his late mother.
Sybil Isaacs died in 2013, leaving a last will executed in 2006. The will excluded her son, David Isaacs, in favour of her daughters Susan and Ruth, leaving him without a share of the estate worth around £630,000.
The Court heard that David moved back into the family property to care for Sybil in around 2011, providing care for her until she died in 2013, and found that David had need for financial provision from the estate, particularly for secure accommodation following his relocation to the family home to care for Sybil.
The Court considered whether David’s omission from the will reflected estrangement between him and Sybil but determined that his exclusion from the will was more likely a consequence of Sybil’s concerns about his marital situation than their relationship.
The Court heard a needs-based defence by Susan and noted that though she did indeed present with substantial health complications, her medical needs could be met with public healthcare and that the alternatives Susan presented were unrealistic and impractical given the size of the estate.
The Court ruled that David should receive a 25% share of the estate as a lump-sum payment, together with 75% of David’s legal costs to be paid by Susan as the unsuccessful defendant to the legal action.
The case further reinforce the presumption that the testator’s wishes should take precedence and only be interfered with when absolutely necessary to avoid what it considers an unreasonable outcome.
The judge said he did not believe David’s omission to be a consequence of estrangement from Sybil. This indicates that estrangement might have been problematic, potentially fatal, to David’s case if it had taken place.
The decision provides helpful guidance on the Court’s considerations when assessing a needs-based defence of a defendant. Particularly, it clarifies that a needs-based defence does not extinguish a claim under the Inheritance Act by default, even where the Court acknowledges that medical needs of the Defendant are serious; rather, the Court expects that the Defendant will provide a detailed and realistic forecast and strategy for financing their medical needs from the estate, and to establish that the estate funds are essential to meeting their medical needs that could not be met by alternative means.
How we can help if you have been left out of a will
If you have been left out of a will, our recommended contentious probate team has the experience and expertise to assist.
Contact our helpline for a free consultation and case review.
We will also be happy to provide details of the funding options available, including deferred fees (pay at the end), and No Win, No Fee.
